The authors suggest that these remains indicate that many features we consider to be basal to the genus Homo may in fact be "correlates of extreme size reduction." The Palau people had brains much larger than Homo floresiensis (the position/validity of this species is the subject of ongoing controversy, involving some questionable characters and claims), but still at the bottom of the scale for Homo, which makes sense due to their small overall stature. The authors of this paper suggest that the features of the Palau specimens support the hypothesis that H. floresiensis was an island-adapted form of H. sapiens, which would mean that their distinctive features were size-associated morphology, not pathology, as some have argued.
Very fascinating find! Read the PLoS paper here, National Geographic's coverage here, and video here.
Berger, L.R., Churchill, S.E., De Klerk, B., Quinn, R.L., Hawks, J. (2008). Small-Bodied Humans from Palau, Micronesia. PLoS ONE, 3(3), e1780. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001780
3 comments:
thanks for the tip on a very cool paper indeed...
btw, palau is an archipelago comprised of many islands, not just one...
Corrected, thanks!
I sense that these Palau hominids will face the same resistance that the hobbits did (and still do). Speaking of the hobbits, any idea why their validity as a distinct taxon is so resisted?
Post a Comment